Tag Archives: eric

For Eric Casebolt, A Resignation Is Not Enough


It was announced earlier today that (now former) Texas police officer Eric Casebolt, a.k.a. “Starsky” or the next incarnation of “Paul Blart,” has resigned from the police force, after video was posted online showing him throw a bikini-clad teenage girl to the ground and later pull his gun on other unarmed youths.  In case you missed it, said video is below:

The fact that America’s most currently famous barrel-roller was allowed to voluntarily resign, and was not fired for his conduct, points to the ongoing reality that police officers in this country are routinely not held accountable for their misconduct.

And, misconduct it was.  If you watch the video, you will see that Casebolt not only arrives at the scene in an amped-up, overly aggressive manner, but that he also continues to escalate the situation and curse at the kids, even while they stand idly by, not provoking anyone.  The girl he ended up grabbing and throwing to the ground appears to actually have been leaving when he goes over to her and brings her back, because apparently in his world, young black girls aren’t allowed to express discontent with an over-zealous cop who thinks he’s acting out a real-life “Grand Theft Auto” mission.

Nope, resignation is not enough for Casebolt.  He should have been fired, which would have had more severe real-life consequences for his lack of professionalism and outright brutality.  By resigning, he is more likely to be able to get a job with another police force, and most likely keeps his pension.  Let’s be real here.  Anybody else working in the private sector would have received a much harsher punishment for this kind of behavior.  And there should be criminal charges brought against him.  While it probably wouldn’t result in much of a conviction or sentence, it would send a message that this kind of thing is unacceptable and unbecoming of the police forces that taxpayers foot the bill for.  Even if a lawsuit ends up being filed in this case, it is the taxpayer who will pay up, not Casebolt.

As it is now, Casebolt will be free to move on in life without much in terms of repercussions for manhandling a young girl and basically endangering the lives of everyone in his immediate surroundings.  I think if “Paul Blart 3” ends up getting made, he has made a pretty strong case for a leading role.



Illegal Immigration, Eric Garner, Torture And Hypocrisy

I have noticed a lot of situations lately which indicate that people’s adherence to the law depends on their own biases and whether they personally agree with it.

When it suits their ends, or when it aligns with something they believe in, many people will be gung-ho about the importance of respecting the law as an absolute. Take, for example, illegal immigration. Many people who want illegal immigrants deported under any and all circumstances will point to the fact that “they broke the law!” It doesn’t matter to them whether the law is just, or if there is any grey area.

Another example is the Eric Garner killing. While many people decry the fact that he was murdered because of a somewhat minor infraction such as selling untaxed cigarettes, there are still others who will say things like “just obey the law, and you won’t have these kinds of problems.”

Now, move on to torture. Even though it is illegal domestically and internationally, many of those same people who cry about the law when it comes to things like illegal immigration or people like Eric Garner, will point to the atrocity of 9/11 as the reason they don’t care if we torture people. Some will deny that rectal feeding or being waterboarded 183 times constitutes torture, and some will admit that the law was broken, but that it’s okay because of the extenuating circumstances.

I think on a certain level, yes, laws were made to be broken or changed. Just because something is legal doesn’t make it the right thing to do, and on the flipside, just because something is illegal doesn’t make it necessarily wrong. But I think there needs to be some consistency involved, and not just an arbitrary, fickle decision to take note of the importance of law only when it does or does not fit in with your personal goals or beliefs.

Photo credit – www.pixabay.com – jpornelasadv